<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL (1951)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmsinreview.com/2009/01/09/the-day-the-earth-stood-still-1951/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmsinreview.com/2009/01/09/the-day-the-earth-stood-still-1951/</link>
	<description>Film Reviews and Articles - Since 1909</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:40:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ekstedt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmsinreview.com/2009/01/09/the-day-the-earth-stood-still-1951/comment-page-1/#comment-8670</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ekstedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmsinreview.com/?p=2296#comment-8670</guid>
		<description>Great review! The original had a real Heart! The remake to me was just another example of Hollywood too lazy to come up with something original or taking the time to pull out a good book, never filmed before, read it and then decide if it would be worth building a good film with real talent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review! The original had a real Heart! The remake to me was just another example of Hollywood too lazy to come up with something original or taking the time to pull out a good book, never filmed before, read it and then decide if it would be worth building a good film with real talent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

