<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Films In Review &#187; Mira Nair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmsinreview.com/tag/mira-nair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmsinreview.com</link>
	<description>Film Reviews and Articles - Since 1909</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AMELIA</title>
		<link>http://www.filmsinreview.com/2009/10/25/amelia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmsinreview.com/2009/10/25/amelia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Alexander</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mira Nair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmsinreview.com/?p=3241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A dull, torturous bore. Could Earhart&#8217;s life really have been this uninteresting? This is not Hilary Swank&#8217;s long, sought-after romantic epic. If Swank and her director, Mira Nair, saw this vehicle as aviation&#8217;s OUT OF AFRICA they should have dressed it up with rumors of espionage, Presidential and First Lady favoritism, and an exciting, illicit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right;  margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.filmsinreview.com%2F2009%2F10%2F25%2Famelia%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.filmsinreview.com%2F2009%2F10%2F25%2Famelia%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="toppicleft"><img src="http://www.filmsinreview.com/wp-images/2009/10/amelia.jpg" alt=""></div>
<p><em>A dull, torturous bore. Could Earhart&#8217;s life really have been this uninteresting?</em></p>
<p>This is not Hilary Swank&#8217;s long, sought-after romantic epic. If Swank and her director, Mira Nair, saw this vehicle as aviation&#8217;s OUT OF AFRICA they should have dressed it up with rumors of espionage, Presidential and First Lady favoritism, and an exciting, illicit affair gone terribly wrong.  </p>
<p>Instead, we get navigation details, weather reports, and a worried, worshipful husband.  </p>
<p>Was the men-only profession of aviation so wimpy that Earhart just sashayed in and made herself the most famous woman in America?  </p>
<p>As soon as I saw that the screenplay was by Ronald Bass (and Anna Hamilton Phelan) I knew it would be a watered-down, strictly by the Hollywood books re-telling of the &#8211; I once thought fascinating &#8211; life of Amelia Earhart.  </p>
<p>After seeing this movie, there is no way you will want to read either of the two books about Earhart (&#8220;East to the Dawn&#8221; by Susan Butler and &#8220;Amelia Earhart: The Mystery Solved&#8221; by Elgin Long) that the movie is based on.  </p>
<p>Amelia Earhart (Hilary Swank) is a Midwest picture-postcard freckled girl with a dream to fly planes. Her instant success begins almost magically. She meets with publisher George Putnam (Richard Gere) and is hired to fly a rich woman&#8217;s plane as a publicity stunt.  </p>
<p>As a hired hand, Gere ably fits the role of devoted husband. Gere looks at Swank as if she were Venus-on-the-Tarmac.   </p>
<p>They marry, and Earhart has an affair, but it does not enliven the story. Since it&#8217;s a well-known historical fact, it is chastely noted without indicating that it was passionate. Gene Vidal (Ewan McGregor) was a dashing, rich aviation pioneer himself and Putnam apparently knew about their tepid assignations. Vidal was a frequent houseguest of the Putnams (with his young son, Gore).  </p>
<p>I kept trying to invent subtext to make Amelia Earhart&#8217;s life worthy of an epic. Why did Putnam put up with Vidal? Was Earhart&#8217;s resentment of Putnam, who worked her like a show horse, pedaling kitchen products and luggage, the instigation for the affair?  </p>
<p>There is not even a murmur that Earhart, on her famous around-the-world trip that failed, was on an espionage mission for Franklin Roosevelt!*</p>
<p>Earhart and Putnam could not relinquish her premier role as America&#8217;s Aviatrix. The first woman to fly around-the-world was up for grabs. It was dangerous and Earhart&#8217;s navigator, Noonan (Christopher Eccleston) was a drunk. But not too drunk to make a pass at gorgeous Amelia the night before their historic flight!</p>
<p>Did Earhart&#8217;s plane, The Electra, just run out of fuel?</p>
<p>Mira Nair is the wrong choice for director. Swank&#8217;s performance is wooden and the framing of Amelia&#8217;s romances are silly and awkward. Gere knows better than to gaze at an actress in such a corny way.</p>
<p>While Swank reaps some of the blame for fashioning this turkey, the true blame goes to the screenwriters. Did they use screenplay-by-the-numbers software? We know exactly what happened &#8211; Amelia got lost and never landed &#8211; so why not give us the intriguing back-story?   </p>
<p>*Earhart had a close, personal relationship with Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt. Was this her motivation for spying? This widely-held rumor upset Eleanor Roosevelt, and shortly before the first lady&#8217;s death she told Earhart&#8217;s sister, &#8220;Franklin and I loved Amelia too much to send her to her death.&#8221;</p>
<hr />
<p><em>Victoria Alexander lives in Las Vegas, Nevada and answers every email. You can contact Victoria directly at masauu@aol.com.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmsinreview.com/2009/10/25/amelia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

